blockversewordysbillionaire.aiyourlistWhiteboardAppquizieunschool

News

Home
Popular
Elections

Genius — OpenServe

Sponsored

Miranda v. Arizona — latest news, discussion & facts — IJR

Miranda v. Arizona

Topic

Miranda v. Arizona

1966 U.S. Supreme Court case establishing the use of the Miranda warning

0members1here now

Ask Genius Site

Feed Discussions About

Sort by

Content type

Loading

Latest Miranda v. Arizona news and discussion

Sort by

Content type

Nothing published yet

The conversation starts anyway — post the first discussion above.

About Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them when they are in custody, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence against them at their trial. Specifically, the Court held that under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the government cannot use a person's statements made in response to an interrogation while in police custody as evidence at the person's criminal trial unless they can show that the person was informed of the right to consult with a lawyer before and during questioning, and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights but also voluntarily waived them before answering questions.

0

members

Facts from Wikidata (CC0).

1

here now

Country: United States

Everything about Miranda v. Arizona →

Live room · 1 here

Be the first in the room — members see you arrive.

Related journals

Connected

Miranda v. Arizona across IJR

Ask Genius by OpenServe about Miranda v. Arizona Create in Studio Build a game Watch videos